<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Push ~ An open push</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidkelly.ie/2008/11/05/tuesday-push-an-open-push/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidkelly.ie/2008/11/05/tuesday-push-an-open-push/</link>
	<description>www.davidkelly.ie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.davidkelly.ie/2008/11/05/tuesday-push-an-open-push/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidkelly.ie/blog/?p=362#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>Hi Des,

No problem at all, good work!

I take your point about useit.com, and the emotional engagement it provided - no one would be drawn into to an innovative service with a design like useit. Having said that, it was more the text above the text box being obscured that struck me. Perhaps it&#039;s the novelty of the idea, but when I first saw it I assumed it was an error / browser compatibility issue. 

As I said above, it was only a small thing, I reckon the services are both excellent examples of quality design &amp; implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Des,</p>
<p>No problem at all, good work!</p>
<p>I take your point about useit.com, and the emotional engagement it provided &#8211; no one would be drawn into to an innovative service with a design like useit. Having said that, it was more the text above the text box being obscured that struck me. Perhaps it&#8217;s the novelty of the idea, but when I first saw it I assumed it was an error / browser compatibility issue. </p>
<p>As I said above, it was only a small thing, I reckon the services are both excellent examples of quality design &#038; implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://www.davidkelly.ie/2008/11/05/tuesday-push-an-open-push/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidkelly.ie/blog/?p=362#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your kind words, much appreciated. 

The characters arm does obscure a little bit of the text box (25 characters in, mind you). This was deliberate. The value it adds is emotional engagement. If all you pursue is usable, you&#039;ll end up with useit.com. We wanted to be a bit more interesting than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your kind words, much appreciated. </p>
<p>The characters arm does obscure a little bit of the text box (25 characters in, mind you). This was deliberate. The value it adds is emotional engagement. If all you pursue is usable, you&#8217;ll end up with useit.com. We wanted to be a bit more interesting than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
